Archive for August, 2007

Alberto Gonzalez and Other News

Monday, August 27th, 2007

I’m glad to see Alberto Gonzalez gone. I don’t understand the ‘firestorm’ over the fired prosecutors, so I’m inherently inclined to think of it as a ‘teacupstorm’ instead. Yet I don’t like the man’s policies, nor can I feel any regret over seeing a chip taken out of the Bush administration. Mr. Gonzalez was instrumental in the expansion of “aggressive” interrogation techniques. He once infamously said “there is no express grant of habeas in the Constitution” (video recording), referring to the right of habeas corpus. He played a critical role in restricting the flow of information out of the presidency. The final nail is of course that he has been a reliable supporter of neoconservative policies. I don’t want such people in the American government. They do not belong in any government.

Senator John Warner is now pretending to be demanding troop withdrawal. He is only asking for a symbolic gesture though, involving only a small number of troops. The largest benefit is that other Republicans may be slightly bolder in wavering from the President’s stance. Forgive me, however, if Mr. Warner does not seem all that brave in asking for a little ’symbolic’ withdrawal.

On a more personal note, what exactly IS required in writing nonfiction? Accumulating and presenting data is one thing, but as I work on my project, I’m starting to worry about accidentally plagiarizing someone. I don’t want to follow too closely to the ideas of other books. I don’t want to produce a redundant book.

Roman Taxes

Tuesday, August 21st, 2007

America has often been compared to Rome today. Iwas going to run down Roman Tax Policy today, and compare it with America. Unfortunately, I can’t find many sources! I’m going to check out some books on Rome from the local library tomorrow. Then I’ll try this again.

In the meanwhile, here are some interesting links on the subject:
Cato: How Excessive Government Killed Rome
Wikipedia: Roman Tax Farming
UNRV: Taxes in the Roman Empire
Penn Museum: Taxes in the Roman Empire

These are interesting, but I’d like to have something more scholarly that isn’t already on the net. That’ll take real books to accomplish.

Response to Eric Dondero

Friday, August 17th, 2007

I address this not to Mr. Dondero himself but to the claims he has been making. I do not feel that the man currently meritsmore than polite demurral. His claims however are at the very heart of whatmen and women likeGeorge Bush, Rudy Guiliani, and Hillary Clinton are using to seek power over the American people. Therefore as much as civilized folk would prefer to offer them the same polite demurral and thereafter consign them to that dustbin which is the usual home of ideas thought up by cranks, they must be addressed.

There is an expected cost analysis thatEric Donderobeen deliberately ignoring. Namely:
“Cost of sharia law in USA = big but finite.
Chance of sharia law in USA = zero.
Expected cost of sharia law in USA = zero.”

Nobodycanhave a meaningful expected cost analysis where the probability of the result to be avoided is zero. If standard operating procedures are sufficient to prevent a negative responsethen it is at best inefficient to put specific safeguards into place.

A good analogy is a strong, stable company which looks at its finances and says that its current stability might change tomorrow, and embarks on a crash course to save itself from bankruptcy, a state that it is nowhere near. The constant fear generates fatigue and damages morale/productivity.Meanwhile the crash program consumes capital without benefit. Eventually the company ceases this destructive course of action or, having consumed their resources, they fall inevitably to actual bankruptcy.

However, the current state of America in the realm of sharia law is invulnerability. Bush and other would-be tyrants in our political system are using the same trick utilized by tyrants in other countries around the world. By deflecting attention from real threats into false threats he gains greatly expanded freedom of action. Otherwise good men like Mr. Dondero are aiding the fascists they claim to oppose by assisting in the effort of deflecting attention.

And while home-grown fascists of Bush’s ilk are unlikely to implement actual sharia law, just as the company which exhausts its resources avoiding bankruptcy will finally crash, fascism in our country will be just as chilling regardless of which of the world’s various gods it is implemented on behalf of.

Guiliani Flipflop on Tape!

Thursday, August 16th, 2007

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boTZVP0ZywQ&eurl

I really didn’t expect this. I haven’t seen many flipflop accusations about Guiliani before, I’ve just seen accusations that he was never conservative in the first place.

Freedom is Submission

Thursday, August 16th, 2007

“We look upon authority too often and focus over and over again, for 30 or 40 or 50 years, as if there is something wrong with authority. We see only the oppressive side of authority. Maybe it comes out of our history and our background. What we don’t see is that freedom is not a concept in which people can do anything they want, be anything they can be. Freedom is about authority. Freedom is about the willingness of every single human being to cede to lawful authority a great deal of discretion about what you do. ”
Guess which famous contemporary politician said this? Rudy Guiliani said this!

Vote Ron Paul! Or if you won’t, at least don’t vote Guiliani! That man is frightening.

Sites which also record the quote:
http://mylittlepouch.blogspot.com/2007/08/my-semi-deliberate-and-nonetheless.html (This is where I first found the quote.)
http://www.reason.com/blog/show/121958.html (This was the first non-blog source I located for it.)
http://www.pensitoreview.com/2007/08/11/rudy-in-1994-freedom-is-about-authority/ (This probides a bit more context)

Struggles of an Autodidact

Wednesday, August 15th, 2007

(For those with less patience, a preface. I haven’t updated for a while and might not for a while, due to acurrent project of mine.)

The task of going from a nobody to a somebody with as few intervening steps as possible is difficult. It is a conundrum faced by ambitious people all around the world. There are a couple of approaches I’ve tried so far to apply to my own life.

The first one, to get by on socializing and avoid working otherwise, is unnatural to me. I’m a very effective social chameleon but I’m a poor self-salesman. My chameleonic nature relies on conformity; Inigh-automatically conform to the expectations of those around me on pretty much everything but ethics and politics. People who are assertive and ambitious typically acquire advantage over me in social situations so long as they are (or are maintaining the illusion of) acting ethically and not advocating overt socialism. Acquiring social advantage over others is typically a circuitous process for me and can be more laborous than actual work. I document the ethical failings of others in conclusive manners, search for ways in which these failings harm them or those around them, and then reveal them to people I believe will act on my findings. (Sometimes this can actually be the person themselves!) “Snitch” is a ridiculously time-consuming social role though, and while I can pull it off persuasively and confidently, it is at best dull. Usually worse than dull – nauseating. I find no pleasurein spending time around unethical people.

The second method, of finding a good job and pursuing it skillfully until I merit promotion, is apparently not possible at all for a dedicated autodidact. It is nigh-impossible to prove with a resume and cover letter that I have the expertise necessary to pursue jobs which are listed as requiring years of experience and training. The exhortation that I can learnnigh anything to a workable skill level within three months at the longest, and usually within two weeks, falls on deaf ears. Nor would I expect otherwise. It would not make sense at all for businesses to make a practice of hiring high-risk employees of the type that I represent. Nor is there a high reward to pay off the high risk. Even if I successfully picked up the necessary skills, something I feel would be easy but companies should justifiably be suspicious of my ability to do, it is unlikely that I represent a superior alternative to what they can get from people who have extensive training and real backgrounds in the field.

Both of the above methods also require more contacts than I have. I come from a humble background. The road of ambition is a long one.

So, what method is left? The traditional method for autodidacts to make their expertise known, the experience-without-experience you might say, is to write books. I know things. I can turn my knowledge into print. If I can be published, I can have something on my resume which theoretically represents experience to potential employers. And, if I can publish something which actually sells, I might get some money outof it. Note that my bar for “actually sells” is small, a per-hour breakdown of minimum wage or even somewhat less would be “success”.

Anyways, what all this means is that my writings on this blog may slow down dramatically… again. Since thoughtless egomania is pointless, I think I need to do something to demonstrate to the thinkers of the world that I’m really as thoughtful as IthinkI am.